Repository navigation
Launch MathGraph Open Challenge: first verified finding free - #272
Draft
heathsanchez wants to merge 46 commits into
Draft
heathsanchez wants to merge 46 commits into
heathsanchez wants to merge 46 commits into
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
…e preserving research
… private intake boundaries
heathsanchez
changed the title
…e and retention handler
… redirect boundaries
…ns until verified
…ion and consequence intake
… and privacy route
This branch was successfully deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
MathGraph Open Challenge — first verified finding free
This replaces the original qualified assurance-page draft with an offer-led site intended to support Heath's LinkedIn challenge.
Commercial promise: Selected repositories may receive a bounded investigation of one consequential software claim. If a consequential, independently reproducible assurance gap is established—including a code defect, missing requirement, lossy interface or unsupported claim—the first confirmed finding is given free, including the decisive witness—not withheld for a sale. No finding, UNKNOWN, and rejected hypotheses are honest outcomes. The intake now asks: What important decision are you making because you believe this software is correct—and what would happen if it were false? Optional paid investigation, repair and requalification are separately scoped.
Implemented
/assurance/landing page explaining entry criteria, consequential decisions, private mailto/LinkedIn initial contact, limits, evidence, and paid resolution/requalification.Boundaries and risk controls
No paid-client testimonials, institutional endorsement, blanket correctness or safety certification, universal automatic scanner, guaranteed finding, or unrestricted free work. Initial contact has no hosted file upload; users are warned not to submit secrets, private source or sensitive vulnerabilities publicly. LinkedIn is a fallback initial route.
Qualification
Re-run complete
MathGraph.org V1 qualification(including browser accessibility and performance) and preserve the existing Check/source-integrity jobs. Verify the new mailto contact destination is actually received before paid LinkedIn promotion.Supersession
This is the consolidation target for overlapping draft #275. The original research navigation and existing proof/evidence boundaries remain intact.